What I'm saying now:

    follow me on Twitter

    Sunday, January 29, 2012

    The SWEETROLL Recipe (mostly for Sam)

    This is the Betty Crocker sticky roll recipe that became my sweetrolls. What is different is listed after:

    http://www.bettycrocker.com/recipes/caramel-pecan-sticky-rolls/4077c5ea-0aa4-4e72-815e-8d12aadbbe87

    2 packages regular or quick active dry yeast becomes 2 "yeast spoons" of SAF Red Instant yeast, but this doesn't make a difference for 90% of people.

    Also, I use 100% King Arthur Flour, and did my kneading with my Kitchen Aid. (but that doesn't matter)
    Used BUTTER, not margarine, dark brown sugar, not light brown, white corn syrup, not brown, to the DOUGH, I added, 1/4 tsp orange extract, 1/4 tsp fiori di sicllia. and 1 tsp tangerine zest (because I still have tangerines in my fridge)
    I used only saigon cinnamon.

    To step 3 (the sauce), I added 1/4tsp vanilla and 1/4 orange extract and another 1 tsp of tangerine zest.
    Left out nuts and raisins

    Wednesday, January 25, 2012

    How I kind of won versus Japanese Knotweed

    Japanese Knotweed, as a lot of people know, is not just an invasive plant and a weed, it's a terrible plant. When it grows in the United States it has a zero-tolerance policy for other plants. It can take damp, nutrient rich earth, like the rare rich fen that my backyard is (the fen actually covers about 5 acres, but I have about 1/50 of an acre of it, and some of its deepest pools) and turn it into nutrient-free, salt-filled, baked clay that is highly basic (my soil pH where the worst knotweed WAS is over 9, despite being chemically acidified and in some places removed and replaced, my normal fen soil ranges from 7.9 to 8.75 (more basic than baking soda, causes chemical burns if you don't wash it off, dangerous to breathe when dry...which is never is, wetter gets more Calcium Carbonate and drier does not.)

    Knotweed is an indiscriminate killer. It will shade plants, eat all their nutrients, grow a system of roots nearly nothing can grow through. It laughs at being sprayed with most herbicides, and even if you poison it with sprays, you generally kill the stuff under it. It likes to grow in broken areas, so what happens is little bits of these long, stringy roots break off, float away, land in a shaley or sandy bank, and destroy wetlands. It's bad, mmkay.
    Above: New York State Worker vs Japanese Knotweed.

    When we first moved into Chez MacMorgan, we removed about 300lbs of Japanese Knotweed from the property. This was bagged, sacked, labeled as "invasive plant, do not compost" and sent out to be burned, including a lot of the dirt around it. We had rhizomes, growing against the neighbor's foundation, that were over 50lbs in weight, over 10ft long, and took over 2 years to remove, by a combination of frost heaving, pulling every rosy red sprout we saw, and painting (not spraying) exposed roots with FULL STRENGTH concentrated Roundup (an off-label use, and should be done carefully.) After a few years of treating the rhizomes (they look like logs) the frost-heave cycle lifted them out of the ground, and I picked them up and bagged them for burning. Where this happened, not a single piece of knotweed has returned. We used a similar technique to kill invasive privet, but did not paint the privet stems with full-strength roundup, we used burning, cutting and painting the stems with roundup as diluted on the package. There are very few people who hate herbicides more than me, so understand that the fact that I resorted to herbicides (after speaking to a chemist, etc.,) was not an easy choice...I literally cried over it, and felt like my biologist chops were being busted, etc. One of my favorite organic people had to pat me on the back and go 'but it's knotweed,' to make it better for me.

    Last year we removed less than a pound of Japanese Knotweed, most of it newly planted, from flooding, from bits dropped by neighbors who mowed it (they know better now) and the rest. Where we found a new growth (which will usually be round, growing from a small, central piece) we dig out a full spade of earth around the plant, threw it out dirt and all, bagged it and labeled it for burning, more than 90% of the time, nothing came back in these spots.

    When attacking an ESTABLISHED MOUND of knotweed, where you cannot access the rhizomes, such as that growing along a city-planted chain-link fence, like that at one edge of my property, the going is slower. You'll note I said that 3-4 years were needed to remove the ones where I could have access to the rhizomes....and this is slower.

    First, and this will make you nuts, allow the knotweed you cannot reach the bottom of to grow to a minimum of 18 inches in height. You need good needle skills for this, so wear gloves and take precautions. Take a small syringe, (you can probably get one from someone who is diabetic,) and pop a hole about 1 inch above the third or forth "knot" in the plant from the ground. These are the breaks in the plants that look like the rings in bamboo. Draw out as much water as you can get from this hole, using the syringe, pointing the needle down into the plant, about a 45 degree angle. Suck until you can't get any more out. If it GUSHES when you poke it initially, allow it to drain (you can put a small hole at the top of the section to help.) If you wait for a couple of dry days, it will probably not gush.

    The knotweed is holding this water in reserve for later. Your job now is to replace that water with your full-strength, non-diluted, Roundup concentrate (I used 4 different compounds, and only this worked.) If you removed 3-4 syringes full of water, add 3-4 of roundup. Remember, it is going to get diluted by the plant.

    Within about a week, the stems you 'got' will begin to die very dramatically. Feel free to cut every inch above your 'targeted' hole. That's already dead. Use this time to get the stems you missed. After about one week more, the stems you got the first week will die to the ground. Pull them out, cut them as low as you can get, bag the debris. Do not compost, and if you live in an area where it may be composted, label it invasive. HELL, LABEL IT MEDICAL WASTE! Just don't let it back into the ground as plant material. Get it burned, do anything.

    Eventually, the rhizomes will stop sending out these long canes. Instead, you will get twisted rosettes of leaves near the rhizomes. Twist them off, then spray or, preferably, drip or paint more weed killer into the holes they leave behind. In time, frost action, flooding and draining and the local plants will pull out the damaged rhizomes. Blackberries, feral roses and currants compete happily with these damaged rhizomes, and will 'win,' against them, although I don't recommend eating them until the poisoned rhizomes are gone.

    If you have a stand like the one in the picture, like the transit worker up there is trying to kill, doing the one-stem at a time thing can be difficult. Easier (though not as effective) is to cut all the stems to about 1-1.5ft in height, place 1-2oz of Roundup in the cut area, wait two weeks, pull up those dead stems and repeat as needed. You will need to be on top of it, lifting out roots as they die, killing rosettes, etc. IT CAN BE DONE, however. This 'kill them all and let god sort them out," view is hard, but it does make a difference, and if you stay on it, killing the new growth is pretty easy.

    Good luck, my Knotweed warriors!

    Tuesday, January 24, 2012

    Unrelated to Anything: How about some free chicken?

    Since I got sick, Phoenix and Lablad have to do a lot more cooking, which means using more convenience foods, like boneless/skinless chicken breasts, to be used in things like grilled chicken sandwich portions and even shake-n-bake. Hey, I like shake-n-bake, a couple of times a year. In fact, if they made a Stove-Top-stuffing without turmeric (which I am allergic to) we'd probably eat Shake-n-Bake and Stove Stop Stuffing about once a month. I've told people that if I have to eat foods like this (which is really easy for my wife whose Mom made A.Things in Crock-Pots (made wrong) and B.Things with Spam and C. Things from Cans and D. Spam-Containing Crockpot Foods from Cans) that as long as they are good and not served with other seriously sodium-filled things, I'll have them in moderation, quite happily.

    If you're wise, you've noticed that a boneless/skinless chicken breast is actually bigger than it used to be. They usually contain extra ribmeat, etc.

    Now, a lot of my 'money saving' suggestions require skills on the part of the cook, this does not, so this is not 'how to make 5 dishes from one chicken,' this is just how to get an extra serving of chicken....

    Next time you get those giant, split boneless, skinless chicken breasts, especially a container of 3-5 lbs of them, get out a pair of scissors and cut the breast piece into 'normal sized' (old fashioned) chicken breast halves. Try to make each piece about the same size. They tend to be super thick on one side, so cut a little bit off the bottom on that side. Now, trim the super-thin edges and the rib meat right off. Cut these into small chunks, and if you're like me, and a family meal includes odd-numbers of meat servings, take any extra breasts you have and chop them up.

    Put the trimmed portions into freezer bags (if they are going into your freezer) or otherwise save them, and trim the chunks into stir-fry sized pieces, put them in freezer bags, and boom, in the freezer.

    Last time I did this with 7lbs of boneless, skinless chicken breasts, I got 4 packages of trimmed cutlets (3 each) and 2 packages (1 lb each) of chopped meat for stir-fries and tacos. Normally, we would've just taken the 9 pieces of chicken, put them in 3 bags and had bigger Shake-n-Bake pieces. Instead, we had 6 meals, not 4, and no one felt like they were short-changed. The gummy, overcooked corners were gone, and we didn't have to overcook the chicken to get that extra-deep part cooked.

    So, there, have some free chicken on me.

    Thursday, December 8, 2011

    How to deal with Research Derangement Syndrome in Wicca and elsewhere

    I'm still trying to get over this latest bout of the lung thing, so I'm not sure this will be explicable as a monologue, but it's been something I've discussed over the past couple of days and I'm trying to crystallize the concept and explain it one-sidedly...which does not work!

    [In the situation described below 'Ruth' is a fictional nutter. She was inspired by a potentially real nutter, but that's not the same thing as being a real nutter. Even the 'potentially real nutter' that inspired this might not be a real nutter, but is described second hand. Some of you will recall two experiences I had with real psychotic individuals, so you can understand if I'm not going to see if the person is a real nutter or not...I've dealt with real nutters, I don't need to poke someone to see if they are nuts, misunderstood or angry! I'm going to assume nuts...and note I'm using "nuts" not psychopathic...someone can have wacky ideas without being certifiable! Someone can disagree with me and not be nuts...but you can't say I said the exact opposite of what I said unless you've got some problem.]

    The journey in this started in part when someone (you know who you are!) emailed me to comment on a third party's "review" (complaint) about one of my older books...I also experienced something similar on a blog where someone was discussing meditation, but that's neither here nor there... I tend to avoid reviews, but her claim was that a person had said that I had said that the only form of Wicca I considered valid was my form of Wicca. Now, I will tell you that coming up with this from one of my books is something that takes A HELL OF A LOT OF NUTS (which is what I replied in the email...some people are nuts, and responding to nuts makes them know that you know that they exist...but if you believe the line after the line 'I'm not claiming this works for everyone' claims that something works for everyone, you're just whacked.) So, I made a note to not follow the link to her review, and when I was in the hospital, and discussing homeopathy (of all things) with a nurse, we came up with the idea of research derangement syndrome...

    Research Derangement Syndrome is the phenomenon where a person investigates a set of things and disregards, glosses over or disputes the efficacy of something that someone is emotionally invested in...and the person with the emotional investment reacts by attaching all sorts of whack-a-d00 reactions to the research. To keep anyone (I hope) from being offended, I'm going to use a fictitious example, of a person who reacts this way to treatments for ear-infections.

    So, author Bob writes a paper about treatments for ear infections which talks about garlic oil ear drops, ear candling, hand massage, antibiotics and waiting. He says there is no evidence the first three do anything, provides a source for that claim, then compares and contrasts antibiotics versus waiting. There are maybe 13 words, including the work cited, that discuss garlic oil ear drops, but his paper is read by reader Ruth (as in Baby Ruth, because she's a lot of nuts) who has used garlic oil ear drops, recommends garlic oil ear drops to her friends and even makes her own garlic ear drops.

    After reading author Bob's paper, she feels the double insult of her chosen treatment not getting enough attention (after all, Bob goes on to compare and contrast two other treatments) and her chosen treatment being labeled as not working. She might even get more insulted if she feels hand massage is a stupid treatment for ear infections, so she feels that by lumping her treatment in with it, Bob has called it stupid. Rather than do the research herself, or even challenge Bob, Ruth reacts by attacking Bob, attacking research, attacking medicine, attacking people who go to the doctor for an ear infection, the hospital who tries to give her antibiotics for an ear infection, etc.

    The conventional response to someone like Ruth is to write her off as a nut. Bob can respond to her personally, but she's a little whacked, and maybe that's a bad idea, so maybe the next time that Bob writes a paper like this he includes some wiggly phrasing, like saying "While some individuals report getting relief from garlic oil, hand massage and ear candling, research shows that there is a better response when patients are either given antibiotics or are encouraged to wait..."

    Bob, burned by Ruth's Research Derangement Syndrome is now actually making the situation worse. Someone like Ruth, who is short a few screws, will read this wiggly phrasing and decide that Bob is HIDING SOMETHING, because if he'd studied the three things he's dismissing, he'd know they didn't work. So now Bob, by trying to deal with the nutters like Ruth, has created, or at least worsened, a whole other set of nutters who now think he's hiding something, because he's trying to not offend those emotionally invested in garlic oil ear drops or whatever.

    My nurse suggested that this is part of the same "two sides" controversy that we see with anti-vaccine people...the idea that there is research supporting two sides of an issue and that all fair minded research must provide both sides, even when there are not both sides. Another friend suggested it is part of the same "teach both sides" we see with creationists...

    So I guess the question I'm struggling with is how do you avoid the research derangement reaction... Do you use wiggly speech like "while X may work for others, I have found that Y works for the following reasons?" Do you just not support your views at all by treating all research as equal? Do you not bring up things that you've tried but have not worked? Do you bring up things you've tried that didn't work and offer an out, like 'but maybe I didn't do it right'? Do you (like me) include a line in your introduction disclaiming stuff by saying "everything here should be considered the opinions of the author, and your mileage may vary?" Do you never say something is wrong when you have proof that it's wrong? Or do you just ignore the occasional nutter and write off their Research Derangement Syndrome as just that... a form of derangement?

    I make no claims of knowing the best reaction, obviously I've leaned towards the idea that beliefs that don't seem to be based on what's written are derangement and reactions that seem to be based on what's written aren't derangement, but other than that I'm stumped...

    So, I guess I'm putting out the idea to the world...is there a Research Derangement thing, how do you deal with it, should you deal with it?

    This has been a very hard thing to even put into words, so please feel free to tell me what is not understandable.

    Tuesday, November 29, 2011

    On my health...and other stuff

    Well, my pulmo wants me to go back to the ER. I've been putting it off for a few days so the world doesn't fall down while my back is turned, but that's what's been going on. I'm seriously bad off right now, trying to make it through.

    Well wishes, hopes, prayers and effective miracle cures are all appreciated.

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011

    About the UAD&D blog

    On the 15th of November, on the third day of a cluster headache episode and while doped to the gills on a new migraine/cluster drug that doesn't work, I decided to write a post to my normal blog giving my players some information for the forthcoming game. At that point I realized that my normal blog, dedicated to my religious and political views, was rapidly becoming a storehouse of information for my players, probably alienating half of my two audiences.
    So I decided to go and turn it into a sort of half-blog, so that my gamers don't have to read about stuff they don't give a flying fart about, and vice versa with my other readers. And so, to that end, I present the UAD&D blog.

    Friday, November 11, 2011

    Questions to ask your character (for development)

    Here is one list of questions you can answer for bonus xp:
    http://dreadpiraterose.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/100-questions-to-ask-about-your-role-playing-character/
    Here are 100 I like more:
    http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474976908598

    Here's the big two:
    What are you afraid of? What terrifies you the most, and why?

    What do you want in life? How are you going to get it?